|
|
Blood On Satan's Claw
1970
Tigon's Blood On Satan's Claw (or Satan's Skin to those
of an "over the pond" persuasion) is supposed to be a sequel
of sorts to the same company's Witchfinder
General, and indeed, a lot of people prefer this less historical,
more hysterical version of the old burning and hanging game.
Personally, I don't think Blood... compares in any way to the fantastic
Witchfinder. The later film has a lot going for it, but by eschewing
the realism of Witchfinder and actually involving black magic,
monsters and genuine witches, it's a different kind of film - more akin
to the Vincent Price vehicle Cry Of The Banshee,
in fact.
Satan's Claw is also full of young adults touching their forelocks
and putting on bad South Western comedy accents - and it's a matter of
taste as to whether you like that. On the plus side, there's a
lot of female nudity on show (including one former Doctor Who assistant
getting 'em out), some spooky scenes and a classic monster, hopping around
wearing a sack and whispering: "Give me my skinnnnn..."
The film starts pretty much the same as Witchfinder (okay, okay,
I'll finish the comparisons there and get on with it) with the camera
panning over the British Countryside before yokel Ralph (contravening
several health and safety regulations by operating a plough wearing a
bad wig) digs up a worm eaten skull with a single eye glowering balefully
from its socket. He takes the local judge to see his find, but when they
get there, the "face of a fiend" has vanished.
Meanwhile, Mar-ster Peter has arrived home with his bride-to-be, and before
you can say "There, there my sweet... all will be well tomorrow"
she's been put in the attic and something has driven her insane.
After the men from the bedlam have taken her off, Peter is told: "Console
yourself... she wouldn't have made a good wife..."
The thing is, though - she looks a lot more saucy as a mentalist, although
the new claws are a minus point.
As the "kids" (none of them look under 16) start acting up in
the village and their leader Angel Blake (professional strumpet Linda
Hayden) is found in possession of a (Satan's?) claw at Sunday School,
Peter decides to get to the bottom of what drove his wife mad and spends
the night in the attic bedroom. Now, we all know that's probably not a
good idea, but the berk still manages to fall asleep, gets attacked
by a hairy claw and ends up chopping his own hand off. Oops.
The judge leaves for London, mumbling something about "letting the
evil grow" (cheers) and attendance continues to drop at Sunday School.
The local quack reckons witchcraft is afoot (he's not wrong), but unlike
Witchfinder (sorry), everyone doesn't start burning people at the
mere mention of the word, and things are allowed to continue.
As the childrens' games get more violent and blind man's buff ends in
the murder of a lad called Mark, Angel goes to see the vicar and de-frocks
in front of him (call me an old cynic, but this scene could have quite
a lot to do with the film's popularity, oi reckons). The priest shows
remarkable resolve in the face of such nymphetism, and his reward? He
gets accused of the rape of Angel and the murder of Mark.
Unfortunately, this is the one plot strand of the film that lets it down
- it's a terrifying scenario which has a last-minute reprieve for the
unjustly accused vicar (something which would never have happened in Witchfinder).
However, this particularly wussy attitude by the filmmakers is saved somewhat
by coming just after a particularly gruelling rape and murder scene as
Angel (now sporting Satan's eyebrows) gets busy with the gardening shears
after a grinning loon has his wicked way with the murdered Mark's sister,
Kathy, watched by the rest of the kids (many of whom now missing sundry
body parts) and the monster, Behemoth.
The judge, at Mar-ster Peter's behest, is on his way back from London
now: "I am ready to return," he growls, "but understand,
I shall use undreamt-of measures."
As patches of hairy skin begin appearing on more of the children, the
judge uses Margaret (a very young indeed Michelle Dotrice) as bait to
track down Angel and Ralph (the plough driver from the beginning of the
film) realises he's the proud owner of Behemoth's missing leg. As the
judge puts his undreamt-of measures into practice, the film rushes towards
a predictably violent and open-ended finale.
There's something inately worrying about the whole story, as children
are forced to muilate themselves to provide skin for their "master"
Behemoth and think nothing of including murder and rape in their previously
harmless games. Behemoth is kept in the background for most of the film,
which is probably no bad thing (with the best will in the world, a one-legged
monster is not a particularly scary one), and instead allows the
wonderfully monickered Angel to do most of his dirty work for him.
This is just a personal view, but I feel the entire film would have been
improved 100 per cent if Behemoth had never been seen, and the film-makers
had left it up to us as to whether it was all down to some kind of mental
intability on Angel's part.
However, the ending is a cracker, as the final freeze-frame focuses on
the judges eye through the flames of the fire he's just used to devastating
effect. What does it all mean? Buggered if I know, but it's a powerful
image...
|


|